The committed action module has been pretty helpful to me.  In the past I've definitely been guilty of making ineffective requests, which has sometimes led to misunderstandings around timelines and deliverables.  More recently I've been more focused on being more straightforward/direct, establishing clear conditions for satisfaction, and getting committed responses.  Although I was a bit uncomfortable at first (as I didn't want to appear rude), I've been pleased with the responsiveness of my colleagues and feel that this practice has made me and the team more productive.

David Fang | Managing Director | ORIX Mezzanine & Private Equity | ORIX USA Corporation | 1717 Main Street, Suite 1100 | Dallas, TX 75201 | t |  214-237-2359 c | 469-394-9977 e | david.fang@orix.com | www.orix.com | www.orixmpe.com

-----Original Message-----
From: ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com [mailto:ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com] On Behalf Of Holt, Wade
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:33 AM
To: ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com
Subject: RE: Committed Action

I agree generally with Scott, but I still communicate some requests as a requirement even to my boss.  For example, if I need an approval from him by a specific deadline, I will make that clear in my communication:  "Please see the below request.  It is important that you confirm approval (or disapproval) by no later than 5pm today."

Wade Holt  |  Managing Director  |  Special Assets  |  ORIX USA Corporation  |  1717 Main Street, Suite 1100  |  Dallas, TX 75201  |  t  |  214-237-2374      e  |  Wade.Holt@orix.com  |  www.orix.com

-----Original Message-----
From: ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com [mailto:ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com] On Behalf Of Griffin, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 6:16 PM
To: ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com
Subject: RE: Committed Action

Personally, I don't think there is a substantive difference between, "Would you please..." and, "Please..." when the request is to a subordinate, but I would be unlikely to use the latter with someone senior to me.

-Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com [mailto:ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com] On Behalf Of Massey, Jordan (OUC)
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 6:55 PM
To: ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com
Subject: RE: Committed Action

I don't necessarily agree.  I think it depends on the situation and if it is truly a request or is really a requirement.

If it is really a requirement, but presented as a question, you may end up seeming to be manipulative, because there is really only one satisfactory answer and any other answer will not be accepted.  At the end of the day - in order to show that committed action concepts are really ok to employ, there has to be a differentiator between a request and a requirement.  If the line is cloudy, your audience will assume questions are really demands and the answer always has to be yes.

My opinion is that requirements/demands should be stated as such.  (EX: Please complete this project by 5pm tomorrow.)

Jordan Massey, CPA, CIA  |  Director  |  Internal Audit  |  ORIX USA Corporation  |  1717 Main Street, Suite 900  |  Dallas, TX 75201  |  t  |  469-385-1378     c  |  214-205-1926     e  |  jordan.massey@orix.com  |  www.orix.com  |  www.orixfoundation.org

-----Original Message-----
From: ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com [mailto:ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com] On Behalf Of Marie Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:11 AM
To: ironlady@stagen.simplelists.com
Subject: Re: Committed Action

Ryan- thanks for the post.  My experiences:

Questions stated respectfully and clearly are almost always well received.

Statements are received as authoritative "calls to action" (even though this  may not be intended) and are not well received most of the time.

-Marie

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 21, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Farha, Ryan <Ryan.Farha@orix.com> wrote:
>
> I've been trying to use Committed Action as much as possible since learning in the HPP.
>
> Before HPP, I had a problem with being direct - my concern was rubbing people the wrong way, or coming off as rude, abrasive, etc. The Committed Action practice has helped me grow out of that concern.  In fact, when I started using it someone told me she appreciates the clarity in assignments so she knows what is urgent and what isn't.  It's a useful tool to prioritize for the recipient.
>
> One other practice point I tried to figure out early on was whether to frame requests as a question (perhaps with someone senior to you) or a statement.
>
> For example, "Jack, can you please . . . ?" versus "Jack, please . . ."
>
> I mostly frame requests as a questions to show respect to the recipient. I'd be curious to know whether any of you disagree with this approach, and think maybe framing as a statement is better with direct reports or in other situations.
>
> Ryan Farha
> Managing Director, Legal
> (214) 237-2242
> ryan.farha@orix.com<mailto:ryan.farha@orix.com>

This message with any attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and do not use, copy or share it before immediately deleting it. Any retransmission, reproduction, distribution, use of or taking of any action in reliance upon, this message or the information contained herein, other than by the intended recipient, is strictly prohibited. No message is or series of messages constitute or are intended to constitute a valid and binding contract.