Committed Action Farha, Ryan (21 Jun 2017 11:56 UTC)
Re: Committed Action Marie Reynolds (21 Jun 2017 14:11 UTC)
RE: Committed Action Massey, Jordan (OUC) (21 Jun 2017 22:55 UTC)
RE: Committed Action Griffin, Scott (21 Jun 2017 23:16 UTC)
RE: Committed Action Holt, Wade (22 Jun 2017 13:32 UTC)
RE: Committed Action Fang, David (22 Jun 2017 14:51 UTC)
RE: Committed Action Wetzler, Rob (22 Jun 2017 15:28 UTC)
RE: Committed Action Paulinelli, Nathalia (22 Jun 2017 18:03 UTC)
RE: Committed Action Tharp, Mark (22 Jun 2017 13:20 UTC)
RE: Committed Action Martin, David (06 Jul 2017 22:16 UTC)
Re: Committed Action Hobeiche, Nicola (07 Jul 2017 03:56 UTC)

Committed Action Farha, Ryan 21 Jun 2017 11:56 UTC

I've been trying to use Committed Action as much as possible since learning in the HPP.

Before HPP, I had a problem with being direct - my concern was rubbing people the wrong way, or coming off as rude, abrasive, etc. The Committed Action practice has helped me grow out of that concern.  In fact, when I started using it someone told me she appreciates the clarity in assignments so she knows what is urgent and what isn’t.  It’s a useful tool to prioritize for the recipient.

One other practice point I tried to figure out early on was whether to frame requests as a question (perhaps with someone senior to you) or a statement.

For example, "Jack, can you please . . . ?" versus "Jack, please . . ."

I mostly frame requests as a questions to show respect to the recipient. I'd be curious to know whether any of you disagree with this approach, and think maybe framing as a statement is better with direct reports or in other situations.

Ryan Farha
Managing Director, Legal
(214) 237-2242
ryan.farha@orix.com<mailto:ryan.farha@orix.com>