Eckenroth 2x2
Jason Eckenroth
(15 Jan 2015 13:51 UTC)
|
Re: Eckenroth 2x2
Jason Eckenroth
(29 Jan 2015 15:53 UTC)
|
QUOTE T REFLECT Rebecca Litwin (30 Jan 2015 02:26 UTC)
|
Add Value "I believe wholeheartedly that a new form of capitalism is emerging. More stakeholders (customers, employees, shareholders, and the larger community) want their businesses to.have a purpose bigger than their product." Mats Lederhausen Inventor and former McDonald's Executive Thank you, Rebecca Rebecca Litwin Down Etc 228 Townsend St. San Francisco, CA 94107 415-348-0084 Phone 415-348-0085 Fax www.downetc.com -----Original Message----- From: list-manager@stagen.simplelists.com [mailto:list-manager@stagen.simplelists.com] On Behalf Of Jason Eckenroth Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 07:53 To: buffett@stagen.simplelists.com Subject: Re: Eckenroth 2x2 I shared my 2x2 early this month. One of the tough realizations was that my key project for the Quarter: Deliverability Delivered (a new product capability that's been a pet project of mine), found itself in the "work in" category. Here are my WWHWW for Deliverability: Why * If ShipCompliant were a winery we would be tracking our customers' satisfaction with our products (which most wineries probably do). We would probably use NPS. We would also want to measure, control and optimize the D2C experience (which begins with the order and ends with receiving of the wine). Our own experiences, those of D2C wine buyers we've spoken to and our data suggests few wineries have the capabilities to track/control the D2C "deliverability" experience and in-general customers find the experience unpredictable/not transparent to frustrating. The sub-optimal "delivery experience" is costing wineries a) directly through returns/damages and b) indirectly through loss of repeat business due to poor customer experience. * Deliverability meets our Purpose: Build Solutions People Love and Use. Deliverability will be used EVERY DAY, and has the opportunity to delight our clients at every interaction. It is also the epitome of SCALE, tapping into the largest unit of scale ShipCompliant deals in, packages (plus the dozens of valuable data points per package relevant to delivering on the WHY mentioned above. What: 1. System of truth 1. The information presented in Deliverability is always accurate and up to date. The user finds it equivalent to going directly to UPS / FDX, and therefore finds value in seeking out the info in one place. 2. Missing information (tracking), is easily diagnosed and the user is empowered to do something about it (e.g. get tracking info faster from a 3PL) 2. Constant / Daily Engagement & Delight 1. The key capabilities are enough to lure users into the system everyday. not for maintenance, but to delight their customers and increase re-order rates and NPS (loyalty) 3. Easy onboard / setup 1. Fully automated activation and setup - even for first time SC customers 4. International / Easily spun out 1. Architected to be easily spun out of the SC mothership 2. Architected to easily add new international and regional carrier types How, Who, When Champion Team When Specifications and Usability Gather user stories, validate assumptions EK EK, SS 8/1/2014 Iterate designs JE JE, EK, SF 8/31/2014 Finalize broad specs EK EK, SC 9/15/2014 Implementation Backend optimization to meet core values SC SC, BO, PV 1/19/2015 Front end implementation for customer validation SC SC, BO, PV 2/5/2015 Customer validation trip and beta launch EK EK, SC 2/5/2015 Communication bus and final front end SC SC, BO, PV 2/20/2015 Complete phase 1 handover to core product group EK SC, BO, PV 2/27/2015 ----------------------------- Jason Eckenroth ceo / founder o. 303.996.2342| jason@shipcompliant.com 1877 Broadway, Suite 703 | Boulder, CO 80302 <http://www.shipcompliant.com/media/img/logo2.png> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Jason Eckenroth <jason@shipcompliant.com> wrote: What I learned putting together my 2x2 based on our existing company goals for Q1 2015, is there isn't a lot of perceived, "low value", "low effort" tasks. Everything is high effort! (relatively). I think this is going to force me to go back to the team and brainstorm more ideas that are closer to us accomplishing. My other surprise was how many "pet projects" of mine actually fit into the Delay / Ignore category. Some of these have already been communicated to the company, so I'm working through where they should actually go. But on first pass, that's what happened. Task Champion Team When % Complete Relative value Relative effort Taxify rev - $25k Pawel Taxify 3/31/2015 10 8 Product Marketing - $200k Jeff Product 3/31/2015 10 7 SCD Bookings - $300k Kent Sales 3/31/2015 10 6 SCW Bookings - $200k Kent Sales 3/31/2015 10 6 Taxify connectors Pawel Taxify 3/31/2015 9 6 Account mgmt program Kent Sales 3/31/2015 8 8 PRO sales Kent eGov 3/31/2015 8 6 IL lawsuits Jeff eGov 3/31/2015 8 6 Obeer integration Jeff Product 3/31/2015 8 4 Taxify scalability - 45 clients Pawel Taxify 3/31/2015 7 8 SCW pricing project Kent Finance 3/31/2015 7 7 Taxify onboarding Pawel Taxify 3/31/2015 6 7 Deliverability delivered Jason Product 3/31/2015 5 9 Taxify completness Pawel Taxify 3/31/2015 5 9 Hiring metrics Kent Finance 3/31/2015 5 4 AF scalability Pawel Product 3/31/2015 4 6 Hire more devs Pawel Development 3/31/2015 4 4 KB Luke Support 3/31/2015 3 6 ----------------------------- Jason Eckenroth ceo / founder o. 303.996.2342| jason@shipcompliant.com 1877 Broadway, Suite 703 | Boulder, CO 80302 <http://www.shipcompliant.com/media/img/logo2.png> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Nathanael Chawkin <Nathanael.Chawkin@stagen.com> wrote: Hi All, Our first teleclass of the quarter is tomorrow, at 10:00 a.m. Central. We will focus on the topics of Making Deliberate Tradeoffs, using the 2x2 and the "Power of a Positive NO!". We will also practice Recalibration. To prepare, we suggest you reflect on the following questions (about the 2x2): * What are we intending to accomplish in 2014, beyond operating the business? In other words, what are we doing to work ON vs. simply working IN our business? Where and how are these projects and initiatives talked about and recorded? * How do I currently prioritize my projects and initiatives? * What are some examples of things that got 'crowded out' by less significant activities in 2013? How valuable would it be if I got better and more consistent at prioritizing? ...at saying NO to good stuff so the best stuff gets done? What makes this hard? Please post your first draft of your 2x2 (permission to be messy). See if you can do a Half year 2x2 - what will be complete approx. within the first quarter (Do First)? What will take longer than a quarter? How do you have to break things down into manageable projects vs. roll things up into larger initiative categories? As usual, we will especially look forward to hearing stories from those who have posted a draft or those who have already been using this tool in their organization. In the spirit of leading the way, we have attached a real, live Stagen Coaching Team 2x2. Best, Nathanael, Lisa, Rick, and Justin Nathanael Chawkin, M.A. | Executive Coach nathanael.chawkin@stagen.com <mailto:nathanael.chawkin@stagen.com> | p: 214.484.7192 | c: 214.531.0129 Stagen | 3535 Travis Street | Suite 100 | Dallas, TX 75204 p: 214.744.9255 | f: 214.744.0094 | www.stagen.com <http://www.stagen.com> Thinking about end of year reporting? Get a head start with our prep video and slides. <http://shipcompliant-1.hs-sites.com/vs_2014_attendees>